Tokenization regulation · Hong Kong
Tokenization regulation in Hong Kong: the SFC circulars
Tokenization is generally permitted in Hong Kong. The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) treats tokenised securities as traditional securities with a tokenisation wrapper, under the principle of “same business, same risks, same rules”. Existing securities law, including the prospectus and offers-of-investments regimes, generally continues to apply, plus SFC expectations on tokenisation risks.
Last updated:
Educational overview, not legal, tax or investment advice. Regulation changes, and the answer for any project depends on the asset, the structure, the investors and where they are. Consult qualified counsel in each jurisdiction before you issue, offer or market anything. Last reviewed 16 October 2026.
Is tokenization legal in Hong Kong?
Generally yes. The SFC regulates tokenised securities as securities. It defines them as traditional financial instruments that are “securities” under the SFO and that use DLT or similar technology in their lifecycle. The tokenisation layer adds ownership risks (how ownership is transferred and recorded) and technology risks (forks, outages, cybersecurity) that intermediaries must manage.
What did the SFC's November 2023 tokenised securities circular change?
The 2 November 2023 circular on intermediaries engaging in tokenised securities-related activities superseded the SFC’s 2019 Statement on Security Token Offerings. In summary:
- The professional-investors-only restriction for tokenised securities was lifted; public offers must still comply with the public offering regimes or an exemption.
- Complexity is assessed on a see-through basis, by reference to the underlying security.
- Intermediaries should discuss plans with their SFC case officer in advance; registered institutions also notify the HKMA.
- Intermediaries must do due diligence on the product, technology, issuer and third-party vendors, and give clients clear information on matters such as settlement finality, transfer limits, smart-contract audits and custody.
Can tokenised funds trade on secondary markets in Hong Kong?
Since 20 April 2026, an SFC circular on secondary trading allows retail trading of tokenised SFC-authorised investment products on SFC-licensed virtual asset trading platforms, with safeguards: at least one market maker per product, published indicative NAV, alerts when prices deviate from NAV, and specific risk disclosures.
How does Libertum fit in?
Libertum is a software platform (T-Suite). It is not licensed, registered or authorised in Hong Kong and is not an SFC-licensed intermediary or virtual asset trading platform there. What the software does:
- On-chain compliance rules. ERC-3643, CIP-113 and authorised XRPL tokens can enforce country allow/restrict lists, maximum balance, hold time and KYC claims, rejecting non-conforming transfers (Compliance).
- KYC and KYB run through Sumsub.
- Structuring module (Beta) with jurisdiction packs for El Salvador CNAD/LEAD, US SEC Reg D/Reg S, EU MiCA/MiFID II and Cayman Islands CIMA. Only the Cayman pack is counsel-reviewed and published; the others are drafts marked “Beta — pending counsel review”. Structuring is a software tool, not a Libertum legal or structuring service.
Libertum, S.A. de C.V. holds an El Salvador Digital Asset Service Provider (DASP) licence from the Comisión Nacional de Activos Digitales (CNAD), registry entry PSAD-0094, covering custody, exchange and transfer of USDT and USDC and receipt and transmission of client orders (LEAD Art. 19 (a), (d) and (f) numerals 1 and 2); RLUSD custody is approved by the CNAD under the same registration. It does not authorise any issuance, has effect in El Salvador only and confers no passporting or authorisation in Hong Kong. Issuers remain responsible, with their own counsel, for registration or exemption analysis in every jurisdiction. See Licences.
Related
- Tokenization regulation hub All jurisdictions compared
- El Salvador: LEAD and the CNAD Digital Assets Issuance Law, certifiers and DASPs
- European Union: MiCA and the DLT Pilot When MiCA applies and when MiFID II does
- United States: SEC rules Howey, Reg D, Reg S, Reg A+
- UAE: VARA, ADGM and DFSA Three regimes in one country
- Singapore: MAS and the SFA Capital markets products and Project Guardian
- Structuring Jurisdiction packs for issuers and their counsel
- Licences What Libertum's DASP licence does and does not cover
- Security token platform How compliance is enforced on-chain
Hong Kong tokenization FAQ
Is tokenization legal in Hong Kong?
Generally yes, but a tokenised security is still a security. Offers to the Hong Kong public must comply with the prospectus or Part IV SFO regimes or fall within an exemption, and intermediaries must meet SFC expectations on tokenisation risks.
Are tokenised securities limited to professional investors?
Not as such. The November 2023 circular lifted the professional-investor-only restriction, but public offers still need to comply with the public offering regimes or an exemption.
Does the 2019 SFC Statement on Security Token Offerings still apply?
No. It was superseded by the 2 November 2023 circular on tokenised securities-related activities.
Is Libertum licensed by the SFC?
No. Libertum is a software platform and holds no SFC licence or registration. Its El Salvador DASP licence (PSAD-0094) has effect in El Salvador only.
Primary sources
Last checked:
- SFC — Circular on intermediaries engaging in tokenised securities-related activities (2 November 2023) — Definition of tokenised securities; 'same business, same risks, same rules'; traditional securities with a tokenisation wrapper; prospectus regime (C(WUMP)O) and Part IV SFO apply to public offers; supersedes the 2019 Statement on Security Token Offerings; professional-investor-only restriction lifted; see-through complexity; advance notification to the SFC (and HKMA for registered institutions); ownership and technology risks; due diligence and client disclosure.
- SFC — Circular on tokenisation of SFC-authorised investment products (2 November 2023, superseded) — Original November 2023 position (primary dealing permitted with safeguards; caution on secondary trading); page marks it as superseded by 26EC22.
- SFC — Circular on tokenisation of SFC-authorised investment products (20 April 2026) — See-through approach to primary dealing; product provider remains ultimately responsible; no public-permissionless chains without additional controls; prior consultation or approval; secondary trading on SFC-licensed VATPs.
- SFC — Circular on secondary trading of tokenised SFC-authorised investment products (20 April 2026) — Retail secondary trading on SFC-licensed VATPs; at least one market maker per product; iNAV publication; price-deviation alerts and risk disclosures.
Talk to our team about your structure
See how T-Suite enforces the rules your counsel sets, and how the Structuring jurisdiction packs help prepare the documents your counsel reviews.